Just TAi Ai

Guess ad in Vogue magazine sparks controversy with its models

A shimmering, ethereal face emerges from a swirling vortex of digital code.
A shimmering, ethereal face emerges from a swirling vortex of digital code.

*Is Vogue Serving Up a Future of Fake Faces? The Guess AI Controversy is a Massive Warning Sign**

Okay, let’s be real – scrolling through TikTok and seeing a seemingly gorgeous model in a Guess ad feels… unsettling, doesn’t it? The uproar over the August 2025 issue of *Vogue* featuring AI-generated models – dubbed Vivienne and Anastasia – is more than just a fashion faux pas; it’s a giant flashing neon sign screaming about the rapidly changing landscape of creativity and, frankly, reality. We’ve been talking about the rise of AI in marketing for years, but seeing it *actually* deployed in a high-profile publication like *Vogue* is a whole different level of… something.

The core of the issue is this: Guess, in partnership with London-based AI marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora, created these entirely synthetic models for their campaign. Valentina Gonzalez and Andreea Petrescu, co-founders of Seraphinne Vallora, insist they're not trying to replace human models – “we’re here to co-exist,” they told *Good Morning America*. But the fact that a major fashion brand is *actively* leaning into this technology, and *Vogue* is giving it a platform, raises some seriously important questions. It feels like we’re entering an era where the very definition of "beauty" is being dictated by algorithms, and that's terrifying.

A flawlessly sculpted, yet subtly vacant, model stands poised in a luxurious, unsettlingly sterile setting.
A flawlessly sculpted, yet subtly vacant, model stands poised in a luxurious, unsettlingly sterile setting.

And let’s not sugarcoat it: the backlash is justified. Payton Wickizer’s blunt “speechless” reaction on TikTok perfectly encapsulates the feeling many are experiencing. Marissa Spagnoli’s pointed question about Guess forgetting its "bombshell" history – campaigns featuring Eva Mendes and Drew Barrymore – hits home. It’s not just about the technology itself; it’s about the erosion of authenticity. As Dr. Rachel Hawkins, a psychologist, rightly pointed out, "The more we're exposed to these images, they become normalized to us, and we start to basically idealize these images that don't actually exist. Then we compare to them and we feel inadequate.” This isn't just a fleeting trend; it's potentially fueling a cycle of unrealistic expectations, particularly for young people.

But here's where it gets *really* interesting. I’m starting to think that this isn’t just about *Vogue* and Guess. If AI can flawlessly generate “stunning” visuals, what’s to stop every brand, every industry, from doing the same? We’re already seeing AI generate art, music, and even entire marketing campaigns. Soon, the line between reality and simulation will become incredibly blurry. And frankly, I worry about the long-term impact on the creative industries – photographers, stylists, even models – who are suddenly competing with a limitless supply of perfectly crafted, algorithm-approved content.

Looking ahead, I suspect we'll see a rise in “AI-verified” influencers, individuals who are essentially digital avatars, designed to maximize engagement. The question isn’t *if* AI will dominate creative spaces, but *how* we, as consumers and as a society, will grapple with the implications. Are we willing to accept a world where genuine human experience is filtered through the lens of an algorithm? It’s a question that deserves a serious conversation – before it’s too late.

A cascade of binary code flows like a river, forming the shape of a beautiful, but ultimately artificial, face.
A cascade of binary code flows like a river, forming the shape of a beautiful, but ultimately artificial, face.

Ultimately, the Guess/Vogue story isn’t just about a questionable advertising campaign. It’s a harbinger of a future where the pursuit of "beautiful" is increasingly detached from the messy, imperfect, and ultimately *human* qualities that make us who we are.